What Cassandra's Consulting Practice Does

Cassandra offers AI consulting for Australian tax, legal and professional-services workflows. Discuss the research, retrieval, integration and review requirements of your practice before choosing an implementation.

Engagements typically cover one of three things: designing and building retrieval-augmented (RAG) systems over a firm's own precedents and knowledge base; evaluating and integrating LLM tooling into existing practice-management workflows; or establishing AI governance that satisfies professional obligations under the TPB Code of Professional Conduct, APES 110 and the Legal Profession Uniform Law.

Define deliverables, hosting arrangements, acceptance criteria and professional review responsibilities in the agreed engagement scope.

The Problems Professionals Face

Managing Partner

Pressure to 'do something with AI' without a clear view of risk, cost or where it actually saves time

→ A scoped opportunity assessment tied to specific workflows, with the professional-obligation analysis done up front

Practice Manager

Vendor tools that don't integrate with the firm's document system, email or practice management software

→ Integration design and build against your actual stack — Microsoft 365, Xero, iManage, LEAP, APS and similar

Knowledge Manager

Years of precedents and prior advice that nobody can search reliably

→ A retrieval system over your own corpus with citations back to the source document and paragraph

Risk & Compliance

No documented position on how AI outputs are reviewed before they reach a client

→ An AI governance framework with review gates, logging and accountability mapped to your professional standards

Key Capabilities

RAG & Knowledge Systems

Retrieval-augmented generation over firm precedents, prior advice, and primary sources, with paragraph-level citations

LLM Integration

Evaluate, select and integrate language-model tooling into existing document, email and matter workflows

Document Intelligence

Extraction, classification and summarisation pipelines for contracts, financial statements and regulatory filings

AI Governance

Review gates, audit logging and accountability structures aligned with TPB, APESB and Legal Profession Uniform Law obligations

Data Residency & Security

Architecture planning that addresses processing locations, provider terms, access controls and retention

Adoption & Training

Role-specific training so juniors, seniors and partners each know what to trust, what to check, and what to reject

What to Ask an AI Implementation Provider

  • How will citations and the underlying authorities be checked?
  • How will the system represent legislative versions, ruling status and court hierarchy?
  • How will the implementation fit the document and matter systems used by the practice?
  • What professional input and review controls are needed for your intended use?

Why Firms Engage Cassandra

  • We run a production tax and legal research engine on Australian primary sources — the consulting practice applies what that taught us
  • Discuss the required technical skills, professional input and review responsibilities when agreeing the scope
  • Agree source traceability, evaluation criteria and review controls as part of the implementation scope
  • Australian-registered company (ABN 70 659 258 367); review the agreed architecture and provider terms for processing locations
  • Fixed-scope engagements with a working system as the deliverable, not a recommendation deck

Professional Trust & Compliance

ABN 70 659 258 367
Australian-registered company, independently verifiable on the ABR
Professional Input
Confirm the professional expertise and independent review your engagement requires before agreeing the scope
Processing & Security
Confirm provider processing, locations, access controls and retention; do not assume Australian-only processing
Governance First
Every design includes review gates and audit logging mapped to your professional standards
Source Citations
Systems we build cite the document and paragraph they relied on
Review-Only Outputs
Nothing we build is designed for unreviewed use in client work

Frequently Asked Questions

Accounting practices, law firms, corporate tax and legal teams, and other professional-services firms in Australia that need AI outputs to be accurate, citable and reviewable. Engagements range from solo practitioners to mid-tier and national firms.

Both. Where an existing tool fits, we integrate it into your workflows. Where the requirement is specific — typically retrieval over your own knowledge base — we design and build it, usually on the same architecture that runs Cassandra's own engines.

Up front. Each engagement starts by mapping the relevant obligations — TPB Code of Professional Conduct, APES 110, the Legal Profession Uniform Law and the Privacy Act 1988 — and designing review gates, logging and accountability to satisfy them before any system is built.

Processing locations depend on the agreed architecture and providers. The published Privacy Policy allows overseas provider processing; confirm the data flow and terms before sharing client information.

A scoped opportunity assessment runs two to four weeks. A retrieval or integration build typically runs eight to sixteen weeks depending on the corpus and the systems involved. Governance frameworks are usually delivered alongside a build rather than as a standalone project.

Book a call. We'll discuss the workflow you want to change, what systems it touches and what a defensible outcome looks like, then propose a fixed scope.

Talk Through an Engagement

Bring the workflow you want to change. We'll tell you honestly whether AI helps, what it would take, and how it stays defensible.

14-day free trial · no credit card