How should tax professionals use AI for research?
Use AI to accelerate the discovery phase — surfacing relevant legislation, rulings, and case law — but never as the final word. Every AI output should be reviewed against primary sources by a qualified professional before client use.
14-day free trial · no credit card
Detailed Answer
AI is best treated as a research assistant, not an oracle. The professional remains responsible for the advice given to the client, regardless of how the underlying research was produced.
The right workflow is: define the question precisely, use AI to surface candidate sources, read the primary sources yourself, draft the analysis, and have a senior reviewer sign off.
Cassandra supports tax research workflows. Check any cited provision, ruling or case directly before relying on the draft.
The Problems Professionals Face
Where to start
→ Frame the research question with the specific legislation or transaction
What comes after step 1
→ Use AI to surface candidate primary sources (legislation, rulings, cases)
What comes after step 2
→ Read each cited primary source directly
What comes after step 3
→ Draft the analysis grounded in those primary sources
What comes after step 4
→ Have a TPB-registered tax agent or CA/CPA review before client use
Key Capabilities
Common pitfall
Copy-pasting AI output into client advice without review
Common pitfall
Trusting AI tools that don't cite primary sources
Common pitfall
Using general-purpose AI (ChatGPT, Claude) for Australian tax — they hallucinate section numbers
Common pitfall
Not documenting which AI tool was used in the file note
Why generic AI is risky for 'how to use AI for tax research'
- Generic AI tools hallucinate Australian legislative section numbers and ATO ruling identifiers
- AI can misidentify the applicable version of a provision
- Check the status and binding effect of any ATO guidance cited
- Using unverifiable AI in professional tax work risks the TPB Code of Professional Conduct
How Cassandra handles this
- Australian tax and legal research workflows
- Check any cited ITAA section, ATO ruling or case against the official text
- Independent professional review is required before relying on an output
- Check the relevant income year, amendments and status directly with the issuing authority
Editorial Standards
Frequently Asked Questions
Tools for this work
Explore the relevant Cassandra engines and workflows. Outputs require independent professional review.
Research Australian tax and law with Cassandra
Create an account or book a call to explore the research workflow, source checking and review requirements.
14-day free trial · no credit card