Daily Challenges

  • Spending hours researching single client queries across multiple legislative sources
  • Manually cross-referencing ITAA 1997, ITAA 1936, ATO rulings, and court decisions
  • Junior staff producing research without proper citations or source verification
  • Limited time for client analysis and communication when research consumes most of the day
  • Difficulty keeping current with ATO ruling updates, legislative amendments, and new court decisions
  • Professional obligations under the Tax Agent Services Act requiring defensible, source-grounded advice

How Cassandra Helps

Legislative Research

Research ITAA 1997, ITAA 1936, GST Act and FBTAA provisions with cross-references and contextual analysis

ATO Ruling Analysis

Search and analyse ATO public rulings, tax determinations, and PCGs with structured summaries

Structured Advice Drafting

Generate advice frameworks with proper citations, headings, and analysis sections — ready for your review

Compliance Research

Research TPB obligations, lodgement requirements, and procedural compliance questions

Practical Workflow Examples

  • Client asks about Division 7A implications of a director loan → provide the loan, company and shareholder facts, then check the provisions and current ATO guidance cited in the research draft
  • Trust distribution query involving Section 100A → Cassandra retrieves the provision, relevant rulings, and key case law with structured analysis
  • CGT concession eligibility under Subdivision 152-A → Cassandra analyses each condition with references to specific sections and thresholds
  • BAS reporting obligation query → Cassandra researches GST Act provisions and applicable ATO guidance

Why Generic AI Falls Short

  • ChatGPT fabricates ITAA section numbers and invents ATO ruling references
  • It cannot distinguish between ITAA 1997 and ITAA 1936 — attributing sections to the wrong Act
  • It has no awareness of the TPB Code of Professional Conduct
  • Unverifiable AI outputs in tax agent work may breach your professional obligations
  • Generic AI has no mechanism for verifying that cited sources actually exist

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes — specifically. Research drafts may include primary-source references; verify each citation, the applicable law and the conclusion before using an output in professional work.

Yes — Cassandra covers the GST Act 1999, relevant ATO rulings on GST, and BAS reporting obligations.

No. Cassandra accelerates research and provides structured drafting support. The tax agent retains full professional responsibility for all advice.

Related Use Cases

AI for Tax Advice Drafting
AI Tax Research Australia

Explore More

AI for Tax Agents Australia
Platform Overview
Pricing

Tools for this work

Explore the relevant Cassandra engines and workflows. Outputs require independent professional review.

Australian Tax

Explore Australian income tax, GST, CGT and trust questions with Cassandra's tax research AI. Frame the facts, examine ATO positions and prepare a working analysis.

TPB Sentinel

Research Australian tax and BAS agent regulation with TPB Sentinel. Explore registration, professional conduct, CPE and practice obligations for the matter.

Built for Your Practice

See how Cassandra fits your tax agent workflow. Try it or request a demo.

Start free trialRequest Demo

14-day free trial · no credit card